I'm adressing the rabid Twilight অনুরাগী if they would listen. I'm also adressing the common অনুরাগী of both sides of this debate.
There are some things one may and may not do in a formal বিতর্ক unless one wants to look like - pardon the language - a freaking donkey.
Nr 01: One may not argue against the debaters points দ্বারা attacking him অথবা her. This is called argumentum ad hominem and is a fallacy. For example: If I am to argue that free elections is wrong and states that the arguer is an imbecile that does not deserve the right to vote, then I have committed a severe personal attack and will be frowned upon in future debates. Do. Not. Attempt. This (Unless one wants to be disrespected).
Nr 02: One may not bring up a point repeatedly on a non-stop basis until every one else is tired and gives up, giving the person an easy victory. This also applies to a group of arguers. This is defined as argumentum ad nauseam and is not good for ones side if ones opponents gets tired and leaves. The person may have won but the audience is gone. Much pointless, right?
Nr 03: Respect is not freely given, it is Earned দ্বারা virtue of the persons ability to argue civily and coming with witty arguments. This is a debate, not the persons own bubble where every one likes him অথবা her. To quote Herbert Spencer: “This survival of the fittest, which I have here sought to express in mechanical terms, is that which Mr. Darwin has called 'natural selection', অথবা the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life." If one cannot বিতর্ক civily, one will not gain the upper hand in it and will almost certainly be trampled over দ্বারা other debaters in the struggle for victory.
Nr 04: Grammar. Proper grammar and spelling will go a long way in helping one earn his/her fellow debaters respect. Spelling ones argument in all upper case letters makes the person look - pardon me again for the language - a whiny, screaming child. This Is irritating.
Alternatives for emphasising are: Using. Periods. Like. This. Spelling the first letter in a word in uppercase adds emphasis too, like the examples above. Italising and bolding অথবা underlining will serve the same purpose.
Nr 04.I: Leetspeak. I cannot emphasise enough that Leetspeak and it's kind is a irritation to Some people. If some are to decipher others messages using up their precious time, they will not respond to it, instead, that person will probably met with ignorance.
Nr 05: Argument from silence. This occurs when one person is asked why he/she dislikes something and tries to divert the subject অথবা keeps quiet. The questioner will then assume almost certainly that the person has not experienced what he/she is being asked, again making the questioned person look like a - pardon - fool.
Nr 06: Non sequitur. When proposing an argument, ones conclusion Must follow from ones statements, otherwise the persons argument is unsupported and may be torn down like bare scaffolding. Example below:
The term [Non sequitur] is often used in everyday speech and reasoning to describe a statement in which premise and conclusion are totally unrelated but which is used as if they were. An example might be: "If I buy this cell phone, all people will প্রণয় me." However, there is no actual relation between buying a cell phone and the প্রণয় of all people. This kind of reasoning is often used in advertising to trigger an emotional purchase.
Nr 07: One must always support their opinion with Facts. Failure in doing so will make the person look like he/she must resort to - pardon me - SHOUTING and cavemen tactics (clobbering others) to win debates. This will not be acceptable (unless one wants to look like a caveman).
I hope that this will improve some of the "debaters present"'s appalling lack of reason in their arguments and I thank আপনি for taking your precious time in পাঠ করা this. I hope it helped.
There are some things one may and may not do in a formal বিতর্ক unless one wants to look like - pardon the language - a freaking donkey.
Nr 01: One may not argue against the debaters points দ্বারা attacking him অথবা her. This is called argumentum ad hominem and is a fallacy. For example: If I am to argue that free elections is wrong and states that the arguer is an imbecile that does not deserve the right to vote, then I have committed a severe personal attack and will be frowned upon in future debates. Do. Not. Attempt. This (Unless one wants to be disrespected).
Nr 02: One may not bring up a point repeatedly on a non-stop basis until every one else is tired and gives up, giving the person an easy victory. This also applies to a group of arguers. This is defined as argumentum ad nauseam and is not good for ones side if ones opponents gets tired and leaves. The person may have won but the audience is gone. Much pointless, right?
Nr 03: Respect is not freely given, it is Earned দ্বারা virtue of the persons ability to argue civily and coming with witty arguments. This is a debate, not the persons own bubble where every one likes him অথবা her. To quote Herbert Spencer: “This survival of the fittest, which I have here sought to express in mechanical terms, is that which Mr. Darwin has called 'natural selection', অথবা the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life." If one cannot বিতর্ক civily, one will not gain the upper hand in it and will almost certainly be trampled over দ্বারা other debaters in the struggle for victory.
Nr 04: Grammar. Proper grammar and spelling will go a long way in helping one earn his/her fellow debaters respect. Spelling ones argument in all upper case letters makes the person look - pardon me again for the language - a whiny, screaming child. This Is irritating.
Alternatives for emphasising are: Using. Periods. Like. This. Spelling the first letter in a word in uppercase adds emphasis too, like the examples above. Italising and bolding অথবা underlining will serve the same purpose.
Nr 04.I: Leetspeak. I cannot emphasise enough that Leetspeak and it's kind is a irritation to Some people. If some are to decipher others messages using up their precious time, they will not respond to it, instead, that person will probably met with ignorance.
Nr 05: Argument from silence. This occurs when one person is asked why he/she dislikes something and tries to divert the subject অথবা keeps quiet. The questioner will then assume almost certainly that the person has not experienced what he/she is being asked, again making the questioned person look like a - pardon - fool.
Nr 06: Non sequitur. When proposing an argument, ones conclusion Must follow from ones statements, otherwise the persons argument is unsupported and may be torn down like bare scaffolding. Example below:
The term [Non sequitur] is often used in everyday speech and reasoning to describe a statement in which premise and conclusion are totally unrelated but which is used as if they were. An example might be: "If I buy this cell phone, all people will প্রণয় me." However, there is no actual relation between buying a cell phone and the প্রণয় of all people. This kind of reasoning is often used in advertising to trigger an emotional purchase.
Nr 07: One must always support their opinion with Facts. Failure in doing so will make the person look like he/she must resort to - pardon me - SHOUTING and cavemen tactics (clobbering others) to win debates. This will not be acceptable (unless one wants to look like a caveman).
I hope that this will improve some of the "debaters present"'s appalling lack of reason in their arguments and I thank আপনি for taking your precious time in পাঠ করা this. I hope it helped.
I don't want to hear about Harry Potter অথবা any other book right now. I'm not setting this up for a বিতর্ক about which is better. I just want to know seriously and honestly why আপনি Twilight অনুরাগী enjoy পাঠ করা Twilight. I want to see an actual reason that Twilight is a good book.
If আপনি don't like Twilight, I don't want to hear আপনি saying anything bad about it. I just want to know why people like it. Because all the debate's I've seen have no actual reasons. They have HP অনুরাগী and Twihards going on about which book is better, but not why they like it.
I do actually want respectful বিতর্ক though. I want to discuss the reasons আপনি give, but nicely.
If আপনি can't be respectful of each other's opinions then just don't comment.
And I'm not trying to hate on Twilight, but if I disagree with আপনি I will বিতর্ক with you.
I don't know if there are other debate's about this, so I'm sorry if there are, but I didn't look.
I'm just rambling now so let's get onto it!
If আপনি don't like Twilight, I don't want to hear আপনি saying anything bad about it. I just want to know why people like it. Because all the debate's I've seen have no actual reasons. They have HP অনুরাগী and Twihards going on about which book is better, but not why they like it.
I do actually want respectful বিতর্ক though. I want to discuss the reasons আপনি give, but nicely.
If আপনি can't be respectful of each other's opinions then just don't comment.
And I'm not trying to hate on Twilight, but if I disagree with আপনি I will বিতর্ক with you.
I don't know if there are other debate's about this, so I'm sorry if there are, but I didn't look.
I'm just rambling now so let's get onto it!
(I didn't include plot, good characters, etc. because those are automatically included)
1. POTATO.
2. pirates
3. ninjas
4. An awesome pirate/ninja fight
5. Swords (preferably celestial bronze)
6. Closets (for Edward to hide deep inside)
7. giraffes
8. YOUR FACE
9. YOUR MOM
10. YOUR MOM'S FACE
11. Butterflies
12. Chuck Norris
13. Jet-packs
14. kittens
15. strip poker :D
16. hand lotion
17. Sue Sylvester
18. sherbet
19. 20 কাঠের বান্শিবিশেষ players :D
20. SNICKERS
21. Jedis
22. Druids :D
23. FREE ICE CREAM
24. A monkey called Jeeves who occasionally slaps Bella
25. YOU.
1. POTATO.
2. pirates
3. ninjas
4. An awesome pirate/ninja fight
5. Swords (preferably celestial bronze)
6. Closets (for Edward to hide deep inside)
7. giraffes
8. YOUR FACE
9. YOUR MOM
10. YOUR MOM'S FACE
11. Butterflies
12. Chuck Norris
13. Jet-packs
14. kittens
15. strip poker :D
16. hand lotion
17. Sue Sylvester
18. sherbet
19. 20 কাঠের বান্শিবিশেষ players :D
20. SNICKERS
21. Jedis
22. Druids :D
23. FREE ICE CREAM
24. A monkey called Jeeves who occasionally slaps Bella
25. YOU.
Is it just me, অথবা does it seem like most of the Twilight অনুরাগী feel that they have to write in capitol letters to get their points across? Personally i find it really annoying.
It's also a fact that if আপনি write in capitol letters IT TAKES LONGER FOR THE BRAIN TO PROCESS THE INFORMATION and therefore takes longer to read. Originally all the road signs (In England anyway) were written in capitol letters, until they were redone and someone found that smaller case letters were quicker to read. So they changed it.
So পরবর্তি time আপনি feel like shouting because your book sucks, don't write in capitols, but put...
*shouting*... at the begining of your speech.
Thank you. That is all.
It's also a fact that if আপনি write in capitol letters IT TAKES LONGER FOR THE BRAIN TO PROCESS THE INFORMATION and therefore takes longer to read. Originally all the road signs (In England anyway) were written in capitol letters, until they were redone and someone found that smaller case letters were quicker to read. So they changed it.
So পরবর্তি time আপনি feel like shouting because your book sucks, don't write in capitols, but put...
*shouting*... at the begining of your speech.
Thank you. That is all.