The শিরোনাম can be misleading, but I couldn't think of another title. lol. I'm not doing an in-depth লেখা of the contrasts between the বই and movies. Not yet, at least.
I just wanted to know if I was the only one that thinks they did it a little backwards. Last I heard, they were looking to turn The Hobbit into a three-part movie series. A trilogy like The Lord of the Rings. But if you've read the books, আপনি would know that The Hobbit should have been one movie, maybe two, and that each of the LotR বই should have been made into three movies.
The Hobbit is actually a short book and while I do like the movie (I'm looking অগ্রবর্তী to the পরবর্তি one), I am a little disappointed that they created a plot for the sake of drama that wasn't anywhere in the actual book. Without creating their own plot, they could have still made two চলচ্চিত্র out of the one book. But they cut so many details out of each of the LotR বই so they could turn each book into one movie. It just seems a little backwards to me.
I প্রণয় both the চলচ্চিত্র and the books, though, even if the চলচ্চিত্র aren't that accurate in comparison to the books.