How come when Roseanne made that supposed racist tweet and the প্রদর্শনী got cancelled, everyone ব্যক্ত "no keep the প্রদর্শনী just take her out" but now that the প্রদর্শনী could get picked up again without her, everyone is now saying "no keep her on it's not the same

Why can't they make up their minds?! Honestly IMO, they should continue the প্রদর্শনী without her. I mean it's not fair that the cast and crew should be out of the job all because of her. I mean I know she was the soul focus of the প্রদর্শনী and she created it and stuff but again, why put everyone out of the job because of one person? Honestly, I think they should've played the reboot out as the main তারকা being either Darlene, Becky অথবা DJ raising their own family অথবা in Becky's case, living their own independent life. To me, it just seemed like a dumb সরানো to have like everyone be the same relationship wise and just life wise. I mean, Becky still acts like a dumb teenager fighting with her parents, Becky and Darlene still fight like teenagers, Roseanne and Jackie still consider Bev an annoying nuisance, Dan's still doing a mildly to unsuccessful drywall business, Roseanne and Dan are still having money problems (course that does describe today's economy), and Roseanne and Dan still make all the decisions in terms of their kids and their kids' kids. There's like no character development at all except for Darlene and DJ being parents to their kids. I get that their goal was always to portray the family as a real family dealing with real issues but sometimes, I think they try too hard that it's just আরো depressing to watch then entertaining. I mean I watch sitcoms to be amused, not be reminded of how crappy the economy is. Sorry I'm getting off topic.