এই প্রশ্নের উত্তর দিন

জ্যাকব ব্ল্যাক প্রশ্ন

How thinks that the imprinting of jacob to nessie was pedo-like, wierd,and should of never happened?

*
i feel that BD was a whole book of fuckery. The jake imprinting on nessie was such a BOLD সরানো from SM. I think that she gave up on the character and didnt want to do anything with anymore , so she went easy way . She gave let jake imprint on freakin baby. I dont logic of that...AT all. i really think what she did to jake was low-blow and forever fucked up his character.
xXTDLxX posted বছরখানেক আগে
 xXTDLxX posted বছরখানেক আগে
next question »

জ্যাকব ব্ল্যাক উত্তর

XbloodyXroseX said:
Technically when the person they imprinting on is that young their প্রণয় develops as a আরো "big brother and little sister" kind of প্রণয় and changes as she gets older. I still didn't like that he imprinted on her though I wished he would have at least imprinted on someone আরো worthy and আরো of a woman, like Leah.
select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
*
i think SM should let jake imprint on leah
xXTDLxX posted বছরখানেক আগে
*
If he had imprinted on Leah then it prolly would of changed some of the story line right? But still, it's kinda disgusting. And really messed up for Jake.
ButteBaby_K posted বছরখানেক আগে
Natalie88 said:
I do! this is the most disgusting thing I've read in Twilight Saga! (not included Bella's childbirth process). I think Meyer shouldn't have made it so implausible.. I mean of course the whole story is a ফ্যান্টাসি but it felt like it was real before this 4th book.. I wouldn't have read it, hadn't it been for Jake.. Jesus! a physically and mentally healthy guy falls in প্রণয় with a baby????? with this little mother- eating monster-zombie?
select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
*
true jake was the only person whom i really liked in the whole series then he went and imprinted on that creep
14jcub posted বছরখানেক আগে
*
I also agree :/
Aguinaga09 posted বছরখানেক আগে
*
he should have imprinted on a human
14jcub posted বছরখানেক আগে
luvutoo said:
I dont think he should have imprinted on her either. I understand why she did it because all the stories were based from Bellas perspective and the coming of her. Everything Bella struggled with and wanted she finally got in Breaking Dawn. She loved Jacob and always wished they were related so she could justify her feelings for him. Since Bella had no siblings the only way Stephenie could do it is দ্বারা him imprinting on her daughter. As far as the book goes there was nothing illicitly sexual about it. I didnt like it but if she was going to write that version i do like the way she did it. Although she eluded to sexual acts she never got into detail with Edward and Bella অথবা any other relationship. I didntl ike it but i appreciated the way she handled her story.
select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
next question »