add a link

Outlander: Caitriona Balfe on why Sandy deserves our pity

মতামত দিন
Fanpup says...
I remember visiting this website once...
It was called Outlander: Caitriona Balfe on why Sandy deserves our pity
Here's some stuff I remembered seeing:
Before we can get onto savoring the much-anticipated reunion this Sunday on
, there is some outstanding business to discuss  — namely, that memorable confrontation between Claire (Caitriona Balfe) and Sandy (Sarah MacRae) at the Harvard event to honor Frank Randall’s legacy.
Many fans refused to show any empathy for Frank’s ex-lover as she excoriated Claire for never wanting him but never wanting to “give him up.” Some viewers challenged the drama’s writers for turning Frank into a martyr and making Sandy out to be a victim. Here’s a sampling of the comments on Twitter:
This manipulative Claire wouldn't have survived 9 novels. Your version of Claire exaggerated her flaws while extolling Frank, ignoring Franks flaws. Gives only show viewer untrue distortion of Claire.
Sorta made Claire look like the bad guy,when she really wasn't.
Candy Sandy was a bitter mistress because Frank couldn’t bring himself to leave Claire before he died. He had a choice, he didn’t take it.
— Marcela Macias (@MarcelaMacias27) October 11, 2017
I agree, but I didn't like that Sandy felt entitled to Frank. He chose not to leave Claire & he set the rules for their marriage
Not sure we read the same books 🤔Claire may not have been perfect BUT she offered Frank a way out years earlier & kept HER part of the deal!
So did Sandy really deserve the final word? Balfe thinks so. In my recent chat with her about season 3, she said she believed it was appropriate for Sandy to express how Claire’s actions had painful consequences.
“People have a tendency to jump on teams and take sides with things. But life is always much more complicated than that,” Balfe told me. “Generally its circumstances that cause people to act in a certain way. Yes, Frank was cheating but that’s because he was in a loveless marriage and a marriage that had no intimacy. That was Claire’s choice. So rather than it being important for Claire to hear that, it was important for the story to tell how it had repercussions for everybody. It doesn’t just affect Claire or Jamie. It affects the marriage. It affects Brianna’s childhood, it affects this other woman’s life. Living with secrets from the Claire and Frank perspective has repercussions beyond the couple.”
“I think the reason that Claire stood there and listened to Sandy was because she recognized another woman in pain and that, on some level, her and Frank were both responsible for that. I think Claire is a big enough person to stand there and listen to it and to allow someone to have their voice. I also think it is a reminder to Claire that if you have the opportunity for happiness you have to seize it.”
And since we were on the subject of Frank, I asked Balfe if she thought Brianna would have gone to England with Frank after he asked for a divorce from Claire.
“I don’t think she would have been choosing a parent,” Balfe said. “I think if she would have gone to England, it would have been to choose an opportunity. Frank tries to make her a pawn, I suppose. But if you want to talk about it from Brianna’s perspective, I don’t think she would see it that way. She wouldn’t want to play that role. So I think if there was an opportunity to go to university in England, then maybe she would have chosen that. But if it was to just go be with her father, probably not.”
1 Amber Tamblyn reaches out to Charlyne Yi after David Cross racist allegations: \'I believe her\'
2 \'Arrow\' star Stephen Amell on that Green Arrow twist
3 Spoiler Room: Scoop on \'The Originals,\' \'Once Upon a Time,\' \'Supernatural\' and more
4 \'American Chopper\' is being revived by Discovery Channel
5 Conan responds to David Letterman\'s response to Conan\'s horse story
read more
save

0 comments