এই প্রশ্নের উত্তর দিন

যেভাবে খুশী প্রশ্ন

Why is there a life ?

 Blu-e posted বছরখানেক আগে
next question »

যেভাবে খুশী উত্তর

prophet69 said:
Just study the lives of a few animals. They have far less choice than humans do. EDIT: There are no proper scientific *theories* for the origin of life - but there are several hypotheses (the difference being that an hypothesis has not been as rigorously tested, and is not as widely-accepted as a theory).
The origin of life is called "abiogenesis", and there are several possible hypotheses. Probably the best-accepted onecurrently is the"RNA world" hypothesis.
This hypothesis notes that while DNA is an excellent information-storage system for the genome, and proteins are structural and catalytic, RNA can do *both*. It can act as information-storage (for example in the genomes of RNA viruses), and it can be structural (e.g. - the ribosome) and catalytic ("ribozymes": RNA-based enzymes).
The theory goes that the conditions in pre-life earth were amenable for the abiotic synthesis of organic molecules such as polysaccharides, polynucleotides, polypeptides, and lipids (this has been borne-out দ্বারা work like the famous Miller-Urey experiment).Some of these chemically-synthesised molecules will have included short oligonucleotides of RNA with যেভাবে খুশী sequences. Some of these sequences will have been capable of "autocatalysis" - making copies of themselves (as DNA can do), and obviously this willhave led to আরো and আরো of this type of RNA oligonucleotide existing. RNA autocatalysis is notoriously error-prone, so mutations will have been abundant: some of these mutations will have led to dead-ends, wherethe molecule could no longer autocatalyse, but others will have improved efficiency. Yet other mutations could lead to the RNA being able to associate with other molecules, like short oligopeptides. This association would sometimes have led to an advantageous behaviour - like increased stability for either অথবা both partners, improved autocatalysis, অথবা even the ability to catalyse the*formation* of oligopeptides on the RNA.
And there আপনি have the beginnings of"life", with the genome-protein relationship, and natural selection (with the most stable and best at autocatalysis becoming আরো predominant).
The wikipedia প্রবন্ধ on abiogenesis gives a আরো detailed বিবরণ of the various hypotheses.
select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
ShadowFan100 said:
There is life because of one person: God

And to Prophet: Dude, animals? NO! জন্তু জানোয়ার have rights like we do, so don't act like they don't. I প্রণয় animals.
select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
*
Obviously আপনি couldn't grasp my point. I haven't ব্যক্ত they don't have the rights. I ব্যক্ত they have less optimism and wish than we do. But, they are still living. জন্তু জানোয়ার can live. Then, Humans should also live. If জন্তু জানোয়ার can live with less advantages, why can't humans? That was my initial and core point.
prophet69 posted বছরখানেক আগে
*
^ So how do আপনি define "advantages"?
LaDispute posted বছরখানেক আগে
*
@Prophet: We may be so incredibly আরো advanced than all other species, but they are আরো smart then আপনি take them for. There's gorillas that can slightly communicate with humans through sign language. Koko the gorilla can understand over 1,000 signs of the American sign langauge. And over 2,000 words in English. They are capable of developing and understanding a language outside of their own natural one. জন্তু জানোয়ার are capable of creating technology too আপনি know. There's chimps in Senegal that make their own spears to hunt other জন্তু জানোয়ার with. Humans are seperior because we have a আরো efficient brain and way of understanding. But give some জন্তু জানোয়ার another million years অথবা so and they might be just as smart as we were a few thousand years ago~
hetalianstella posted বছরখানেক আগে
hetalianstella said:
Tons of asteroids over the course of billions of years crashed into Earth bringing water and bacterial life which over আরো billions of years slowly evolved into life we know today.
That's the most accepted scientific explanation but choose to believe in whatever আপনি wish~

select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
*
So where did the first bacteria come from? ;P
LaDispute posted বছরখানেক আগে
*
Probably came from some other planet that had the right conditions to form life~
hetalianstella posted বছরখানেক আগে
*
No, I mean the first bacteria evaaaa. 'The conditions were right' doesn't explain how they came to be; they don't pop out of nowhere.
LaDispute posted বছরখানেক আগে
*
Not sure. Maybe it's always existed :P
hetalianstella posted বছরখানেক আগে
XxKeithHarkinxX said:
I could go really in depth on this, but that will probably start arguments.

So basically there is life because everything about earth's atmosphere is perfect to sustain life. There is saying "life always finds a way" and that can be applied to why there is life, in science if there is the perfect sitiuation for something to happen, it will most likely happen

God I প্রণয় science

select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
*
and as Stella ব্যক্ত the bacteria from মহাকাশ brought via asteroids. Basically humans are nuclear মহাকাশ trash
XxKeithHarkinxX posted বছরখানেক আগে
*
Not trying to argue here but its just that...nothing in the physical world is perfect. Just saying, not trying to be mean.
ShadowFan100 posted বছরখানেক আগে
*
^For once this didn't start and argument
XxKeithHarkinxX posted বছরখানেক আগে
StarWarrior said:
Life is on earth so people could have a choice to follow their own path, God অথবা Saten. If আপনি are not following God আপনি are following Saten, there's nothing in between.

That is what I belive, I don't care what other people belive, আপনি can belive what ever আপনি want.
select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
next question »