এই প্রশ্নের উত্তর দিন

যেভাবে খুশী প্রশ্ন

How far would আপনি go to prove a point?

 How far would আপনি go to prove a point?
 JetBlack_ posted বছরখানেক আগে
next question »

যেভাবে খুশী উত্তর

BlindBandit92 said:
Whatever is necessary and whatever fits the current situation.
select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
wantadog said:
I've been known to go to excessives to prove myself right.
select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
zanhar1 said:
Extremely.
I'm almost dangerously stubborn.
select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
CokeTheUmbreon said:
Depends.
select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
Mauserfan1910 said:
Usually to pubmed অথবা some other reputable scientific journal

select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
TheLefteris24 said:
Honestly, if আপনি asked me on the past, I would have ব্যক্ত extremely since I used to be quite Stubborn. Well, I still am. Just not as much as I used to XD Now, it depends on the occasion. When it comes to proving something not only for my sake but for others as well অথবা when a Subject I strongly feel about gets involved, I'll go as much as I can, providing anything necessary. If it's about most kinds of arguments which prove to be pointless in the end, I'll simply state my stance on the matter and reasons for it. If people still have an issue with that, I couldn't care less. I don't mind getting into আরো detail অথবা explaining further for those who might not get what I have ব্যক্ত at first but I won't spend time to amplify my statements to those who simply dismiss them. Leaving a conversation অথবা not replying back doesn't mean accepting what another has told you. It is just pretty tiring to deal with a person who is hooked in disagreeing with আপনি just for the sake of it which happens pretty often. Quite draining really. That being said, I can admit when I'm wrong and follow another's point if it's reasonable. Continuing the argument feels meaningless otherwise. A conversation is about everyone participating in it to have learnt something at the end of it and not about someone coming out on top. I find the realization of the first to be respectable in a person and the later to be a pretty stupid and an immature way of thinking. Cooperation is key. If আপনি don't have that, there's no point in bothering !!!!
select as best answer
 Honestly, if আপনি asked me on the past, I would have ব্যক্ত extremely since I used to be quite Stubborn. Well, I still am. Just not as much as I used to XD Now, it depends on the occasion. When it comes to proving something not only for my sake but for others as well অথবা when a Subject I strongly feel about gets involved, I'll go as much as I can, providing anything necessary. If it's about most kinds of arguments which prove to be pointless in the end, I'll simply state my stance on the matter and reasons for it. If people still have an issue with that, I couldn't care less. I don't mind getting into আরো detail অথবা explaining further for those who might not get what I have ব্যক্ত at first but I won't spend time to amplify my statements to those who simply dismiss them. Leaving a conversation অথবা not replying back doesn't mean accepting what another has told you. It is just pretty tiring to deal with a person who is hooked in disagreeing with আপনি just for the sake of it which happens pretty often. Quite draining really. That being said, I can admit when I'm wrong and follow another's point if it's reasonable. Continuing the argument feels meaningless otherwise. A conversation is about everyone participating in it to have learnt something at the end of it and not about someone coming out on top. I find the realization of the first to be respectable in a person and the later to be a pretty stupid and an immature way of thinking. Cooperation is key. If আপনি don't have that, there's no point in bothering !!!!
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
next question »