Is human experimentation wrong ?

I only agree with human experimentation in certain contexts.

1. The person has to be willing. To use a corpse, the person needs to have প্রদত্ত consent while still alive. It is completely and totally wrong to use someone as an object without their consent.

2. Whatever's being tested should be relatively safe. What I mean is that prior tests should be done in labs to minimize the risk of major harm to the person.

3. As আপনি said, ethics definitely plays a role in that I only agree with human experimentation as long as it's beneficial to society (as should be decided দ্বারা some sort of international ethics panel).

If any of those criteria aren't met, then that's crossing the line into what's immoral.

I'm pretty okay with human experimentation, so long as the human was made aware of any and all potential side effects, and gave their full consent.

My opinions:

I think experimenting on criminals (and I mean really DESPICABLE criminals) is far better, morally, than experimenting on animals. I also think it will have আরো accurate results, when testing human medicine. Besides, people would be less likely to commit crimes.

I think experimenting on dead humans is also fine, but only if their family/friends agree to it.

আরো medicines and better medicines make the world a better place. ^.^

I don't know what you're asking.

As far as I know, humans are already experimented on. They test drugs and products on humans before they can sell anything.

I'd say that clinical trials are, in effect, human experimentation. They're based in necessity, but they are essentially experimentation on humans, just with a very strong idea of what the outcome might be based off of preclinical trials on animals.

I do, however, see a distinct problem with experimenting from the stage of "we've only seen it in vitro". For those who don't know, in vitro is a study not taking place in a living being. These studies are often way too incomplete to provide a reasonable picture of the dangers involved in utilizing a drug অথবা treatment. As such, it puts lives at risk, since there's no conceivable way that a doctor can assess the risks involved based solely off of these tests.

So to get to the answer I provide: it's not wrong as long as the people in প্রশ্ন provide full consent and understand the risks involved. There are ethical concerns involved with paying people to participate, but that's another story. If they're dead, the only consent comes while they're living, and that consent is required to conduct such experimentation.

I'm okay with human experimentation as long if it's নিরাপদ and the person that is experimented on volunteered for it.