when আপনি go around ফ্যানপপ আপনি will see there is an obvious era of ডিজনি everyone's in favor of: The 90's but they are only successful because most of the members are from that era, they grew up with them and there for they think they are the best, and although that's great that they think so, that is far from successful economically.
Believe it অথবা not সিন্ড্রেলা is আরো successful than The Little Mermaid, and Lady and the Tramp is আরো successful than Aladdin. not দ্বারা much but still. this is exactly what I'm talking about. Many of the ডিজনি চলচ্চিত্র of the late 30s- 60s are very well known but many people who didn't exist in that generation might say things like "its OK but its just old". when in fact many চলচ্চিত্র are very similar to others, Bambi and the Lion King, সিন্ড্রেলা and Aladdin, and every ডিজনি princess movie is very similar (they are all about a girl who wants something more). they just appeal to the audience of the generation more. with a few exceptions.
and one final note, remember what i ব্যক্ত about monumentally successful, well here are some reviews of some very জনপ্রিয় yet unsuccessful অথবা less that monumental ডিজনি চলচ্চিত্র (from Rottontomatoes.com)
The Hunchback of Notre Dame-
"Considering that ডিজনি couldn't help but trash Victor Hugo's novel in the process of reforming it for tender young sensibilities, this animated adaptation of his Notre Dame de Paris is pricklier and আরো disturbing than we had any right to expect."
Mulan-
"Memo to the gang at Walt ডিজনি animation: Your formula is showing."
Hercules-
[An] insipid, lifeless, animated feature.
Tarzan- " ডিজনি Studios seems to প্রণয় the concept of feral children."
but খড় half of the ডিজনি চলচ্চিত্র that are in the ডিজনি খিলান got reviews like these and look where they are today.
but be warned when আপনি have kids, don't be surprized if they say things like
"Beauty and the Beast is ok, but its just...... old, i don't get it, i like Tangled/ Frozen/ whatever much better."
