do আপনি think the band was better when Jermaine left অথবা should he have stayed

*
i think Jermaine should of stayed he was sooooooooooo sexy when he was a kid i প্রণয় আপনি jermaine
rania97 posted বছরখানেক আগে
*
ya jermaine is awesome I have a মাছ named Jermaine after him হাঃ হাঃ হাঃ
julialovesMJ posted বছরখানেক আগে
*
cool to tell আপনি the truth i have a dog named after him
rania97 posted বছরখানেক আগে
*
i প্রণয় the jacksons
MJlady98 posted বছরখানেক আগে
 rania97 posted বছরখানেক আগে
next question »

The Jackson 5 উত্তর

House34 said:
I think they should have stayed..mainly because it was hard for them to split..Michael cried so much.. Jermaine was sad too ..
I প্রণয় Michael and Jermaine so much..

I think they should have stayed together
select as best answer
 I think they should have stayed..mainly because it was hard for them to split..Michael cried so much.. Jermaine was sad too .. I প্রণয় Michael and Jermaine so much.. I think they should have stayed together
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
*
yeah yore right and jermaine waz soooooooooo cut ewhen he waz younger too
rania97 posted বছরখানেক আগে
Vexi said:
I think Jermaine should've stayed. That's exactly why I প্রণয় the Jackson 5 আরো than the Jacksons. I প্রণয় Randy in the group, too, but I প্রণয় Jermaine in the group. His voice was perfect for the Jackson 5. ;]
select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
supermjfan said:
IT WAS BETTER AFTER HE LEFT THEN MICHAEL WAS
THE LEAD I LOVED MICHAEL AS THE LEAD
select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
*
well jermaine was a good singer to i wanted him to stay in the band
rania97 posted বছরখানেক আগে
julialovesMJ said:
I think it wuz defiantly better with jermaine. He was very talented গান গাওয়া with them.
select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
*
jermaine wasn't just a good singer he waz like a great singer পরবর্তি to micheal in the band
rania97 posted বছরখানেক আগে
Karlee56 said:
i honostly think that he should have stayed with his but he wanted to be with his brother.
select as best answer
posted বছরখানেক আগে 
next question »