|
bri-marie said:
I don't think there's a to ideas - whether the idea be about vampires, werewolves, royalty, অথবা just plain normal people. I can't speak for everyone, just myself, of course. But, for me, it's not the "new age vampires" that "drive me wild." It's the stories. It's the way they're written. It's the characters and situations. I can relate to Rose completely, and yet, at the same time, she is so other-worldly and mystical that I can't even touch her on the relatability. If Rachelle had written the same story, only instead of vampires, her characters had been werewolves, I'd still read it and প্রণয় it just as much. I প্রণয় Amelia At-Water Rhodes' shape-shifters, and Meg Cabbot's ghosts, and R.A. Salavator's elves. Not because they are shape-shifter, ghosts, and elves, but because the authors have made them human, প্রদত্ত them human problems, and still kept the mystical aspects there. The অতিপ্রাকৃতিক has always been popular. Zombies, wizards, vampires, werewolves, shape-shifters, angels, demons, god, ghosts, dragons, ectect. They've all had their "turn in the spotlight" so to speak. Now, it just happens to be vampires.
|
|