Welcome to the last of the classic Mary Sue tests. This one is going to be difficult, since Aurora has so little screentime and personality. But I'll try my best.
Unique traits without contacts অথবা hair dye- Yes. It's hard to gauge Aurora's exact eye color, but she seems to have বেগুনী eyes, which is definitely unique (and not even natural). Since it's not a natural trait in real people, it's getting a full point. 1.
An odd name- No. 'Aurora' is probably the most normal name of the classic princesses, and not that out there. Even Briar Rose isn't that unusual.
Looks constantly মতামত প্রদত্ত on- Definitely. It's literally her nickname (which আরো people recognize her দ্বারা than her actual name), and one of the gifts she was given. 1.
Multiple characters falling for her- No, only Phillip.
Gets into the relationships she wants- Yes. Like Snow White, she literally sings a song about wanting her prince. 1.
Always the hero- ...I'm seeing a pattern here with the classic princesses.
No flaws অথবা any flaws addressed অথবা called out on- Yes. Aurora doesn't have many personality traits, let alone flaws. Even touching the spinning wheel, unlike Snow White eating the apple, isn't a flaw since she was hypnotized. 2.
Seen as perfect/angelic in everyone's eyes- That's most of Aurora's character. 2.
Always loved and trusted without earning it- I guess? Phillip immediately loved her just after watching her, though that's the case for all the classic princesses. She doesn't interact with many other characters, aside from the পরী who of course would প্রণয় her. 2.
প্রণয় and trust from closed-off characters- No. The only one in the film is Maleficent, who definitely doesn't.
Other characters degraded for her sake- Kind of. The পরী are portrayed as bumbling in comparison to her gracefulness. 1.
A rival to make her look good- I wouldn't call Maleficent her 'rival' (they don't compare traits like beauty even one-sidedly like Snow White and the evil queen). But she does go after her and look scary and threatening in comparison to her gentleness, so... .5
Never fails- Yes, but she didn't try to do much. She succeeded in meeting someone (not just in her dreams) and ending up with him. She didn't succeed in avoiding the spinning wheel, but she was hypnotized. 1.
Never injured- I guess not, she pricked her finger on the spinning wheel and died- sorry, I mean, 'fell into a deep sleep'.
Always praised and rewarded without earning it- Not really. She didn't earn her happy ending as much as the other classics, but she didn't do much not to deserve it either.
Unrealistically skilled/powerful- Definitely not. We don't see any of her skills, not even skills she's bad at like the fairies.
Always figures things out- No. She didn't figure out the পরী were lying to her for her whole life.
Kind but deadly- No. She's kind (supposedly) but not at all deadly.
Tragic backstory- Kind of. Almost killed as a baby, separated from her parents, and raised in isolation, though the one thing that undermines this is that her life doesn't seem that tragic and she doesn't consider it such, aside from being vaguely annoyed দ্বারা her guardians treating her like a child. She isn't abused অথবা made a slave like her fellow classics. .5
Skilled in a wide variety of things- Nope.
Contradictory traits- No, mostly because she doesn't have distinct personality traits to contradict.
Always gets what she wants- Yes. It turned out the stranger she fell for in the woods happened to be the person she was betrothed to, after she cried about not being able to see him again. Aside from that, like Snow, I can't remember anything else she wanted. 1.
Rarely shows negative emotions- I guess not. She does break down upon finding out she's a princess and her guardians have been lying to her (and আরো importantly, that she can't see Phillip again), when she could've gone along with it with a smile (which would be less realistic).
A resurrection- Yes. 1.
That's 14 out of 24. It sounds like she's the least Sue-ish of the classic princesses, but that's mostly because she doesn't have much personality, which is also a Sue trait. All of the classics are bordering on Sue, though I still maintain that সিন্ড্রেলা is the most realistic. All of them fit the "angelic" category, since they're meant to be "the perfect princess". Don't know who I should do next, but I'll probably do Gary Stu tests for male characters and tests for honorary princesses/non-princesses.
Unique traits without contacts অথবা hair dye- Yes. It's hard to gauge Aurora's exact eye color, but she seems to have বেগুনী eyes, which is definitely unique (and not even natural). Since it's not a natural trait in real people, it's getting a full point. 1.
An odd name- No. 'Aurora' is probably the most normal name of the classic princesses, and not that out there. Even Briar Rose isn't that unusual.
Looks constantly মতামত প্রদত্ত on- Definitely. It's literally her nickname (which আরো people recognize her দ্বারা than her actual name), and one of the gifts she was given. 1.
Multiple characters falling for her- No, only Phillip.
Gets into the relationships she wants- Yes. Like Snow White, she literally sings a song about wanting her prince. 1.
Always the hero- ...I'm seeing a pattern here with the classic princesses.
No flaws অথবা any flaws addressed অথবা called out on- Yes. Aurora doesn't have many personality traits, let alone flaws. Even touching the spinning wheel, unlike Snow White eating the apple, isn't a flaw since she was hypnotized. 2.
Seen as perfect/angelic in everyone's eyes- That's most of Aurora's character. 2.
Always loved and trusted without earning it- I guess? Phillip immediately loved her just after watching her, though that's the case for all the classic princesses. She doesn't interact with many other characters, aside from the পরী who of course would প্রণয় her. 2.
প্রণয় and trust from closed-off characters- No. The only one in the film is Maleficent, who definitely doesn't.
Other characters degraded for her sake- Kind of. The পরী are portrayed as bumbling in comparison to her gracefulness. 1.
A rival to make her look good- I wouldn't call Maleficent her 'rival' (they don't compare traits like beauty even one-sidedly like Snow White and the evil queen). But she does go after her and look scary and threatening in comparison to her gentleness, so... .5
Never fails- Yes, but she didn't try to do much. She succeeded in meeting someone (not just in her dreams) and ending up with him. She didn't succeed in avoiding the spinning wheel, but she was hypnotized. 1.
Never injured- I guess not, she pricked her finger on the spinning wheel and died- sorry, I mean, 'fell into a deep sleep'.
Always praised and rewarded without earning it- Not really. She didn't earn her happy ending as much as the other classics, but she didn't do much not to deserve it either.
Unrealistically skilled/powerful- Definitely not. We don't see any of her skills, not even skills she's bad at like the fairies.
Always figures things out- No. She didn't figure out the পরী were lying to her for her whole life.
Kind but deadly- No. She's kind (supposedly) but not at all deadly.
Tragic backstory- Kind of. Almost killed as a baby, separated from her parents, and raised in isolation, though the one thing that undermines this is that her life doesn't seem that tragic and she doesn't consider it such, aside from being vaguely annoyed দ্বারা her guardians treating her like a child. She isn't abused অথবা made a slave like her fellow classics. .5
Skilled in a wide variety of things- Nope.
Contradictory traits- No, mostly because she doesn't have distinct personality traits to contradict.
Always gets what she wants- Yes. It turned out the stranger she fell for in the woods happened to be the person she was betrothed to, after she cried about not being able to see him again. Aside from that, like Snow, I can't remember anything else she wanted. 1.
Rarely shows negative emotions- I guess not. She does break down upon finding out she's a princess and her guardians have been lying to her (and আরো importantly, that she can't see Phillip again), when she could've gone along with it with a smile (which would be less realistic).
A resurrection- Yes. 1.
That's 14 out of 24. It sounds like she's the least Sue-ish of the classic princesses, but that's mostly because she doesn't have much personality, which is also a Sue trait. All of the classics are bordering on Sue, though I still maintain that সিন্ড্রেলা is the most realistic. All of them fit the "angelic" category, since they're meant to be "the perfect princess". Don't know who I should do next, but I'll probably do Gary Stu tests for male characters and tests for honorary princesses/non-princesses.
Who is the most beautiful ডিজনি heroine ever drawn according to ফ্যানপপ princess fans? Let's find out, shall we? This তালিকা does not necessarily reflect my own personal opinion but instead shows the results according to approximately forty voters per round. We'll work our way to the শীর্ষ starting at number fifteen...
Kida is about eighty eight hundred years old but doesn't look a দিন over 22.
15. Poor Kida. Her film was considered second-rate ডিজনি দ্বারা most and her looks don't get much appreciation either. To her credit, Kida is one of the most unique princesses in appearance and personality....
Early concept art of Belle and the Beast
Beauty and the Beast; often considered the প্রায় দেড়সেরি বোতল opus of the Walt ডিজনি company was released on November 13, 1991. As most people know, it is the only traditionally animated film to তারিখ to have garnered an Oscar nomination for Best Picture. This may have been due to the approach to this film. It was so unusual for an animated film; having a screen writer, অভিনয় director, flawless score, elements that were typically reserved for high-budget live-action films. So much care and detail was put into this film that entire বই could be written about...
Type Three, "The Achiever"
