A lot of us who have seen the BBC TV series অথবা read the book of Little Dorrit might not know the great connection between the great writer and his novel, অথবা might wonder how did he come out with this marvelous idea.
and now, before I relate to আপনি the connection between Charles Dickens and the story of Little Dorrit, let's know a little about Dickens:
Charles John Huffam Dickens was Born at Portsea on February 7th, 1812, the সেকেন্ড Child of John Dickens of his wife Elizabeth.
there's a fact that some people don't know, that the Marshalsea was a real prison, which was used as debtor's prison until 1842, and then it was closed.
Charles Dickens' Childhood was spent under the shadow of economic insecurity, a shadow grew draker বছর দ্বারা বছর as the family moved, first to London,then to Chatham and from there back to লন্ডন ( early 1824) the boy might have had a successful career, but at that time, John Dickens had so many creditors, the family হারিয়ে গেছে their fortune,and it ended up with the arrest of John Dickens and his removal to the debtors' prison of the Marshalsea John Dickens owned a baker £40 and 10 shillings, Mrs.Dickens with her four children went to the Marshalsea to যোগদান her husband, young Charles was sent to work from where he walked five miles (8 km) every দিন to Warren's blacking factory, for six shillings a week ,and spent 10 hours a দিন in working, the family spent a few months in the Marshalsea with no hope of getting out of it, those three months for Charles Dickens are times of utter misery, humiliation and dispair, the memory of which he later confessed he could not quite shake off.
however a legacy came to rescue the family, it enabled John Dickens to leave the prison , to send his children to school, and give them proper education.
Charles Dickens mentioned the Marshalsea in these two novels: David Copperfield and The Pickwick Papers , and described it with lots of details in Little Dorrit (1857) in which the main character (as we all know) Amy, was born in the Marshalsea because her father was imprisoned for reasons so complex that no one can how to get him out.
and now, before I relate to আপনি the connection between Charles Dickens and the story of Little Dorrit, let's know a little about Dickens:
Charles John Huffam Dickens was Born at Portsea on February 7th, 1812, the সেকেন্ড Child of John Dickens of his wife Elizabeth.
there's a fact that some people don't know, that the Marshalsea was a real prison, which was used as debtor's prison until 1842, and then it was closed.
Charles Dickens' Childhood was spent under the shadow of economic insecurity, a shadow grew draker বছর দ্বারা বছর as the family moved, first to London,then to Chatham and from there back to লন্ডন ( early 1824) the boy might have had a successful career, but at that time, John Dickens had so many creditors, the family হারিয়ে গেছে their fortune,and it ended up with the arrest of John Dickens and his removal to the debtors' prison of the Marshalsea John Dickens owned a baker £40 and 10 shillings, Mrs.Dickens with her four children went to the Marshalsea to যোগদান her husband, young Charles was sent to work from where he walked five miles (8 km) every দিন to Warren's blacking factory, for six shillings a week ,and spent 10 hours a দিন in working, the family spent a few months in the Marshalsea with no hope of getting out of it, those three months for Charles Dickens are times of utter misery, humiliation and dispair, the memory of which he later confessed he could not quite shake off.
however a legacy came to rescue the family, it enabled John Dickens to leave the prison , to send his children to school, and give them proper education.
Charles Dickens mentioned the Marshalsea in these two novels: David Copperfield and The Pickwick Papers , and described it with lots of details in Little Dorrit (1857) in which the main character (as we all know) Amy, was born in the Marshalsea because her father was imprisoned for reasons so complex that no one can how to get him out.
I have watched the big reveal scene four times today including once with the subtitles. The way I understand it, either Arthur and Amy are half-brother and half-sister (sharing the same mother), অথবা they each have separate mothers, in which case Mrs. Clennam owes Amy nothing. If Amy is the daughter of the unnamed dancer and the Sr. Mr. Clennam, then Mrs. Clennam owes Amy the legacy. If Arthur is the son of Mr. Clennam and the unnamed dancer, then the Clennam's don't owe Amy anything.
ALSO, what does the watch have to do with it? AND wouldn't Flintwich have figured out that Rigaud must've killed his brother in order to come দ্বারা those papers? That's just a loose end, but the relationship between Amy and Arthur is আরো important.
ALSO, what does the watch have to do with it? AND wouldn't Flintwich have figured out that Rigaud must've killed his brother in order to come দ্বারা those papers? That's just a loose end, but the relationship between Amy and Arthur is আরো important.