দ্যা পেঙ্গুইন অব মাদাগাস্কার Article: My REAL review on Inkoo Kang's "Review" on the POM Movie

2

My REAL review on Inkoo Kang's "Review" on the POM Movie

posted by peacebaby7

Okay. I just read the প্রবন্ধ myself out of undying curiosity (click link to read it yourself), and I have to say . . . I'm laughing my tail feathers off. This is what I would say if I had the opportunity to talk to this guy.

Ms, Inkoo Kang,

Your "review"—if আপনি can call it that—on the upcoming Penguins of Madagascar movie is laughable. This so-called review delves too much into your interpretation of everything about the movie that was wrong, give অথবা take that one statement about almost enjoying that one chase scene. If আপনি wanted to give a proper review, আপনি should've first প্রদত্ত much আরো information on how the movie could've been improved and WHY the points আপনি mentioned were wrong, rather than just stating WHAT was wrong. আপনি want to talk big words and over-analyzing faults? Try this on, Ms. Inkoo Kang.

আপনি have focused too much on the film's faults, giving only one side to your argument. To provide a solid and sound argument, one must point out why the other side to the argument is wrong. Allow me to demonstrate.

আপনি claim the penguins are "unfunny, unmoving, and uninspired," but আপনি never explained why আপনি think so. I'll have আপনি know many think the penguins are funny at least at times. Whether it's a one-liner ("We killed 'em and ate their livers.") অথবা it's just an action (Come on, the penguins playing at the train controls in the third film was a little funny. Just a little.), there's at least one thing the penguins have done to make someone laugh. Even if they haven't for you, doesn't mean they're necessarily "unfunny." আপনি just have a different sense of humor, I presume.

As far as "unmoving," I admit the penguins haven't had many "moving" moments in the "Madagascar" trilogy. However, as far as the trailers go, আপনি have to admit, Skipper bringing the young hatchling (Private) into his brotherhood was just a little moving. Of course, I wouldn't know this until I watched the movie, especially since আপনি didn't explain why আপনি felt it was unmoving yourself.

"Uninspired"? Do আপনি know not the meaning? Inspired; adjective: aroused, animated, অথবা imbued with the spirit to do something, দ্বারা অথবা as if দ্বারা অতিপ্রাকৃতিক অথবা divine influence (dictionary.reference.com). What makes আপনি think the movie is uninspired? I'm thinking it might be inspired to, I don't know, make people laugh. There's probably some better message in the movie as well, since, from what I've seen from DreamWorks, there always is if আপনি think hard enough. I have yet to figure out what it is myself, since I obviously haven't seen it, but I'm sure I can come up with something. My guess is that it'd be along the lines of brotherhood অথবা something, but I don't know yet.

Speaking of, আপনি say the film has a "distinct lack of purpose." Which চলচ্চিত্র do আপনি think has a purpose? It would have been absolutely fantastic for আপনি to have প্রদত্ত us some examples for why আপনি believe the movie has no purpose (you have a right to uphold your opinion, but আপনি have to support it if আপনি want others to agree with you). Furthermore, what would've প্রদত্ত the movie purpose for you? Your thoughts on that would've been nice. আপনি also mentioned that the movie "caters to an audience that doesn't exist" because of the references not many people would get. How would আপনি know that? My best friend is a অনুরাগী of a প্রদর্শনী I've never even heard of until he told me he liked it. How do আপনি know no one will understand those references? While many people will not, it still brings a smile to the face of those who would get that reference. Additionally, the movie may still bring a smile to the face of the unknowing "eight-year-olds" because I would imagine it still has funny moments. Even if they don't get a reference, doesn't mean they won't find it funny (I've found references funny without fully understanding them. I know I'm not the only one). I realize I'm ignorant to if these references will be funny অথবা not, but then again, not everyone has the same sense of humor as I.

আপনি ব্যক্ত that there "isn't much to the film's story, yet it's stuffed to the gills with plot." If there's one thing I've noticed about DreamWork's films, it's that it's never just a story. The "Madagascar" trilogy relays the message that প্রথমপাতা isn't where আপনি are, but who you're with. "Shrek" is a story about acceptance, correlating to the idea that everyone's different, and that's okay, and আপনি have to accept yourself and others to truly be happy. "Kung Fu Panda" sends a message in that to accomplish anything, আপনি have to first believe in yourself ("There is no secret ingredient"). It all starts with you. Even if this movie is an exception to this idea, it would be really awesome if আপনি would've explained why আপনি feel that way.

আপনি mentioned that Dave's character is basically ruined because of his humor. Last time I checked, audiences প্রণয় a villain with a little humorous side. A villain that's too dark wouldn't appeal to younger audiences anyway (ooh, that reminds me of your "point" made earlier. hm . . .).

First and foremost about your thoughts on North Wind, it's a SEAL, not an OTTER. If আপনি don't know the facts before আপনি propose an argument, then you've basically ruined any chance of gaining support because people will believe আপনি have no idea what you're talking about. Second, what makes আপনি think Eva's only purpose is to be sexy? How do আপনি know they're not also relaying the idea that women can be intelligent as well? Not to mention that from what I've seen in the trailers, Kowalski is the only one falling for her. আপনি could've at least explained why it seemed that way to you.

The following paragraph is merely just my opinion of your argument about Classified, and has nothing to do about how আপনি presented it. I must say, I do partially agree with your argument about the pompous Agent Classified, but I think it's pretty awesome that Skipper has someone in his same covert classification to be compared to, causing a humorous clash between the duo. And I believe he wants a little আরো than just "taking the credit." How do আপনি know he just doesn't want জন্তু জানোয়ার to be safe? How do আপনি know he doesn't want some credit because he feels as though he needs the support from his team? Meaning, if he doesn't seem as though he made a success conceived with his help, he won't seem as important, and North Wind will see him as a failure? You'd be surprised what insecurity can drive someone to do. Of course, that is only my opinion, and I would not know until I watched the movie to make my own interpretation.

I have no problem if আপনি like the movie অথবা not. But if you're going to post a review for the whole world to see, DO IT RIGHT.

Now, did আপনি see how I presented my counter-argument? I used examples from the trailers, and even other চলচ্চিত্র to present my case. I also mentioned your side of the argument to help প্রদর্শনী a contrast between my and your opinion, as to allow my readers to make up their own minds, rather than present one side and BOMBARD them with my opinion, presenting it as if it were solid fact. Your very vague descriptions of your opinions don't exactly tell anyone why they shouldn't watch it. All I see is, "Don't watch it because it's bad." If আপনি would've just explained why it's bad, then আপনি would've done just fine, and I wouldn't have ব্যক্ত a word.

Lots of love, peacebaby7

To the fanguins, the main reason I wrote this is to make those who found the "review" unsettling realize how overly-critical this প্রবন্ধ was. Based on the few মতামত on her review, I see I'm not the only one who feels that her review could've been a lot better. I was not judging the fact that she didn't like the movie, but rather that she just needs to put আরো thought into her reviews. Your thoughts on my thoughts on her thoughts?

pmmom38 and 27Kowalski like this

27Kowalski I couldn't have said it better myself. *claps*

peacebaby8 I won't get into your review too much because you clearly went out of your way to misread Inkoo Kang's (and therefore find a way to justify your butthurt), but here are a few thoughts: 1. Inkoo Kang is a woman. 2. She's seen the movie; she's a professional (and respected) film critic. 3. She didn't call the penguins uninspired; she called the movie uninspired. Check out the context. (Reading! It's fundamental!) And here's a bonus fourth: She HAS seen the movie, not just the trailer. That's what pros do.

CaptSkipper Film critics often get to see the movie before it's released. I assume it wasn't mentioned (or she forgot) that Short Fuse was a seal. I do hope there are more feel-y moments than she mentioned. Honestly, my biggest concern of the movie was that they'd put comedy over development and plot. I really hope they flesh their characters out more than what this review seems to claim.

27Kowalski @peacebaby8: Hey, slow down there, mister. First, what's with your username? Are you trying to mock the actual peacebaby7? Is that what you're trying to do? Because it looks like that to me, and, to be honest, I think it's quite rude. (Also, I find it really hard to believe it's a coincidence, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.) Second, how do you know all that? Do you know Miss Inkoo Kang personally or what? Did she tell you she's seen the movie? Because she doesn't say so in her so-called review. She talks about things everyone who's seen the trailers knows. Third, if she really saw the movie and paid attention to it she would've known the difference between a seal and an otter. Seriously, it's not that hard. Lastly, peacebaby7 (and I) might have misread the "uninspired Penguins" part, but all of her points still stand.

peacebaby7 @CaptSkipper: I did wonder about that, but she didn't seem to explain herself in such a way that made me think that. Personally, I think the movie will have some feel-y moments because of a couple of the small snippets in the trailers, but of course I won't know until I see it. @peacebaby8: Nice username. Nice to know I have an admirer. And you made an account just to waste your time with me, too? I'm touched. I'll have you know that I had no "butthurt" when I read her review (yes, I realized she was a woman after I'd written, and just didn't have the motivation to change it). I have no problem that she didn't like the movie, as I clearly stated in my argument. One of my closest friends doesn't even like it. Anyway, let's just say she saw the movie. Why did she not make this more clear? An awesome opening statement would've been something along the lines of, "I had the opportunity to view the [i]Penguins of Madagascar[/i] movie recently blah blah blah . . ." to let people know. Even without saying that, a proper review would've made it blatantly obvious that she'd seen it. If you think she's a respected film critic, that's your opinion. But if she really wants to give people insight on a movie, whether it's good or bad, she should really put more thought into her "reviews." If I had never been a fan of POM or the [i]Madagascar[/i] movies, reading her review on the movie wouldn't have let me know much about it. While you say I "went out of [my] way to misread" the article, I think she went out of her way to over-criticize the movie without telling anyone really anything about it. You're absolutely right! Reading is fundamental! Which is exactly why she should've clarified that she was talking about the movie itself instead of just the penguins, because it seemed more like she was talking about the penguins in the THREE times I read it over to fully understand her argument, or at least what I got out of it. If you're going to write a review, or write PERIOD, it's important to speak clerically if you want the majority of audiences to understand you. As someone who enjoys writing and reading, that's something I'm pretty certain I would know. Or is it just common sense? You be the judge. And to be fair, most of what I said still stands. She should've given a much better argument if she wanted people to take her seriously, and she definitely should've known the facts (again, seal, not an otter). If she would've supported herself better, I would've had nothing to say other than she has a right to her opinion. Lastly, your second and fourth thoughts are basically the same thing. (What was that about reading is fundamental again?)

peacebaby8 My first choice as username was "Ugh." It was taken, so I went with peacebaby8. It's not rude. Irreverent, maybe. But try not to get upset about something that doesn't matter, OK? It's akin to getting bent out of shape over a review of a movie you haven't seen. Ton answer your questions: I know all that because, yes, I know Inkoo personally. Not well, but I've been in a room with her on several occasions and had conversations with her. She's smart and she knows more about movies than most people, even other critics. It's not a "so-called review." It's a review. I can't speak to the seal/otter thing, but lots of film critics - including the great Roger Ebert, and Manohla Dargis, and A.O. Scott - get the occasional fact wrong in a movie review. That's what happens when you're watching a movie and writing notes in the dark. Or maybe she just thought the seal looked like an otter. On that you'd have to ask her. But even if I hadn't known she saw the movie, this line in her review kind of gives it away: "Ten seconds might be the longest length of time allowed to pass between nonstop nattering in “Penguins of Madagascar.” Not "...the longest length of time allowed to pass between nonstop nattering in THE TRAILER FOR 'Penguins of Madagascar.'" Or this line, which implies she knows how it ends: "Sure, there's a muddled lesson at the end, as tacked on as a Post-It on a piece of week-old cake." Or this line: "There isn't much to the film's story, and yet it's stuffed to the gills with plot." Like I wrote before: Reading! It's fundamental. And there's also this thing called context. I even looked it up so you'd get it: "[T]he circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood and assessed." You know, like referencing moments from the movie that aren't in the trailer. Like the ending. And, lastly, I'm trying to think how often film critics write explicitly in a review "I saw this movie" or some other relatively interchangeable phrase. Ugh. Talk about bringing a knife to a gun fight.

peacebaby8 Ugh (my preferred username!). I repeated myself because I wanted to make sure someone who has as hard a time reading as you do understood that point. And apparently it worked! You even brought it up! Maybe they'll accept you in AP English next year.

peacebaby7 @peacebaby8: I don't doubt her intelligence. I don't doubt her criticism. I doubt her review itself and its lack of clarity. Okay, fine. It's a review. You're absolutely, one hundred percent correct. It's just not written well. And to be fair, there weren't JUST trailer releases. There were two teaser scenes as well, which is what I thought she may have been referencing to. As far as the line about the ending, I did have my doubts on my argument with that as well, I'll admit. I have no problem admitting when I'm wrong. But I wasn't wrong about everything, either. As far as the "stuffed to the gills" line, anyone can watch a few trailers and a couple teaser scenes and make an assumption about that. I also find it quite surprising that you feel as though you fully understand the word "context" when you didn't seem to have applied it to my thoughts. How much did you really read everything I'd previously stated, backing up all the way to the beginning of my article? Okay, she saw the movie. I was absolutely wrong about that. But I still stand my argument that she should've written a better review, one that presented more of a solid argument in why she didn't enjoy the movie. She never fully explained why she felt the way she did about most of her points. Why did she think it was uninspired? Unmoving? Unfunny? Short on fun? The only points she explained was her disliking of the references and her main reason she didn't like Dave. If she could've given a little more insight on that, that would've been fantastic, and this whole thing wouldn't have gotten started because, as I said, I uphold her right to her opinion. One has to give more clerical compensation to their own opinion if they want other's support. Yeah, you're right. Simply stating that a critic saw the movie is a bit ridiculous. She [i]obviously[/i] saw it if she's a "respected movie critic," right? But just because she saw it, it doesn't mean her review was good or commendable. Aw, how beautifully ignorant you are. No, I didn't call you stupid. Ignorant just means you don't know. I'll have you know I have no problem reading at all. In fact, as a JUNIOR in high school, I'm ALREADY in AP English, and acing it. Normally, seniors would be the ones taking it, but I'm just so advanced in reading and writing that I was accepted into the honors course. And to be perfectly honest, I don't care if you believe me or not, nor if you even think I deserve to be in the course. I know more about me than you do. And I think a knife is pretty good compared to a finger gun.

xDark_Angelx Mhh, I wouldn't really judge her review yet until we get the chance to see it. As of now, there's not much to go off of to either deny or agree with her claims. Next week, we can certainly determine if the review is appropriate judgement of the movie. Until then, as I said, simply ignore whatever is said about the movie. Yes, critics get a chance to see it beforehand, but I rarely read those because they either raise my expectations or lower them, unless I feel a movie is gonna bomb. And with expectations, they all drift away when we see the final project. I do hope it's good, honestly. They certainly deserve it. Based on the trailers, I'm not expecting anything epic or touching, simply a comedic film with unique characters. I really hope we get some heartwarming scenes, though. The four penguins basically being brothers would be great for the movie touch on.

peacebaby7 @xDark_Angelx: Yeah, I agree. I never denied her claims, per se. As I said at the end, my purpose in writing this was just to hopefully make some of the fanguins on here that were upset about it feel a little better. I also agree with your last statements. The over-judging some of her opinions mainly came from my first-reaction thoughts that she hadn't seen it. Despite that she has, I still would've liked to have known more "why" than just "what." I won't drag you into that, though.

peacebaby7 There we go, peacebaby8. I fixed my review to accurately align to the mistakes that I compelled you point out. Thanks again for being oh so helpful. I hope it satisfies you.

SJF_Penguin2 When I read Inkoo Kang's review two days ago (before this review of the review), my first thought was that I couldn't put much stock in the opinion of someone who thought Short Fuse was an otter. We all make mistakes, but we should all do our research and thoroughly proofread before making something public too. I tweeted the error directly to the author yesterday, but I have not heard back and I don't expect to. As for the content of the review, I think Kang didn't go into detail about why she didn't like something, because she didn't feel a need. She thought the film was "unfunny" probably because she didn't laugh in the theater; "unmoving" because it did not move or touch her personally; lacking purpose because she didn't think the [i]Madagascar[/i] franchise (or the world) needed it; et cetera. Her opinions are her opinions, and while I disagree with them based on what I have seen in the trailers and clips, she is entitled to leave the theater feeling nothing and to write a review about feeling nothing. What is most important is not what a critic who watches [i]Penguins of Madagascar[/i] once and then moves on to watching the next movie thinks but what the fans of the franchise, particularly fans of the penguins, think. DreamWorks did not make this spin-off to become the next [i]Wizard of Oz[/i] or [i]Citizen Kane[/i] or [i]Schindler's List[/i]. It wasn't made with a realistic expectation of winning a wheelbarrow full of the most prestigious Hollywood awards, and it won't. It was created mainly to appeal to those who already love the penguin characters, to those who already appreciate the humor of these cute and cuddly birds. From what I've seen so far, DreamWorks seems to have succeeded and will have a commercial success even if the movie gets only mixed critical reviews. That's why I wouldn't be surprised if we see [i]Penguins of Madagascar 2[/i] hitting theaters by the end of the decade.

peacebaby7 @SJF_Penguin2: Well said. I guess I just personally think going into a little more detail would've made her review a little more solid. Like I said, I mainly wrote this because I noticed a few fanguins on here upset about it, and I was only hoping to make them feel a little better. I also agree with what you said about the movie appealing to those who already love the penguins. The main reason I was defending myself earlier wasn't necessarily to prove my argument right, or hers wrong, but because I felt as though my intelligence was wrongly questioned. I may not be the smartest person on earth, but I'm not an idiot. And to have someone make an account for that purpose really set the fuse. I apologize if I seemed a bit boarish in my taking up for myself.

3

Goodbye Private Chapter 6

posted by legendary7

They tired and hungry, especially the lemurs who weren't used to walking so long.
Ma: "I'm beat. Can we stop for the night."
K: "Negative,"
The whole team was yawning. It was apparent they all needed rest.

---Factory---
It was dead silent for awhile.
P: "Help! Please some one!"
N: "I don't think anyone can hear আপনি from in here, Private."
Private noticed Skipper groaning.
P: "Skipper, are আপনি sure you're okay?"
S: "I have a major headache,"
N: "Wait, Skipper, did আপনি say আপনি were tired and dizzy before?"
S: "Yes, but why does that matter?"
N: "Did আপনি get hit on your head?"
S: "Yeah, matter of fact I lost...

1

Romeo and Juliet... and Romeo?

posted by karenkook

Chapter 3
Meanwhile, back at the লেমুর habitat
Julien kept tossing and turning as he slept. He was having a nightmare, but it started out as a great dream. Julien was laughing as he ran through a familiar part of Madagascar. He was having fun exploring and partying with his subjects. All of his subjects cheered as he danced to the beat. He encouraged everyone else to dance with him. Julien watched as the other lemurs started to dance as well, except for one young male ruffed লেমুর who sat under the darkness of a tree. His body was white. He has patches of black on his tail, paws, hips, face,...

17

Kowalski and Blowhole duet

posted by karenkook

Kowalski: Wait, I think I can explain.
Blowhole: It will be extremely lame.
Kowalski: Do আপনি mind? This is science.
Blowhole: It's a kind of weird alliance.
Kowalski: Yes! Take my experimental power cell.
Blowhole: Add the diaboligizer's evil spell.
Kowalski: Plus Julien's MP3 player
Blowhole: The combo that makes this musical slayer.

Blowhole and Kowalski: Now everybody sing! Everybody sing! Everybody has to sing. আপনি don't have a choice, but to modulate your voice, because everybody must sing.
Zoo animals: Sing, sing, sing, sing, sing, sing, sing.

Kowalski: The zoo is caught in an energy bubble.
Blowhole:...

5

Mad Scientist (part 1)

posted by chaos-ice

“Ah huh, Bingo!” Kowalski ব্যক্ত proudly.

“What is it Kowalski?” Skipper asked as he moves near Kowalski.

“I have completed my energy converter and it’s now ready for action” Kowalski said.

“So what does it do? I hope this gotta be good” Skipper crossed his flippers

“It will convert negative energy to positive energy and vice versa” Kowalski replied.

“Okay, now explain it in English, less brainiac” Skipper ব্যক্ত sarcastically.

“This thing can convert evil things to goodness” Kowalski explained.

“And?” Skipper asked thinking that this device might also have a negative...

6

A Week in Death Chapter 3: Is this true?

posted by 67Dodge

Skipper couldn't really describe it, the car crashing into him, he didn't feel much, all he could describe the feeling as being: "Like a cork popping out of a wine bottle". He looked around and all he saw were cars zooming across the road, then realized his team was gone, he walked around endlessly. "Well it seems we got separated দ্বারা that bump," ব্যক্ত Skipper. "Gotta get back to the HQ, they're probably worried to death about me," ব্যক্ত Skipper. Skipper then looked around and saw a map on the ground, he picked it up and looked at the রাস্তা he was at. "Ah, just 2 miles away, not very far at all,"...

10

Highschool!- Part 9

posted by skipperfan5431

Kowalski unlocked the doors and Lilly jumped into the front seat. "Hey. Ready to go?" Lilly asked, waving goodbye to her mother. Kowalski nodded his head and drove off to their destination.
--------------------------------------------------
তারিখ LOCATION!!!!!!
"Kowalski. When can I take this blindfold off?" Lilly asked, touching the blue cloth on her eyes. "Now." Kowalski replied. Parking the car. Lilly removed the blindfold from her eyes and saw a large gray building with a big blue model earth on top. "Is this the.." "Yeah! The science center!" Kowalski exclaimed, bouncing with excitment....

4

PoM Comic বই Better Than Episodes?

posted by Bluepenguin

I'm পাঠ করা some of the synopsises of the PoM comic বই on Madagascar Wikia, and some are better than the real episodes!

Issue 1: Synopsis - "Join the Penguins of Madagascar on an all-new mission! When the Penguins discover that the zoo's new platypus Mia has been separated from her eggs, they put their military minds together to hatch a plan for a Great Escape - back to her native Australia! Goodbye New York, Hello adventure!"

Issue 2: Synopsis - "Stranded in Brazil, Skipper enlists the help of some unusual locales, including a snake named Jose who is anything but, in order to reunite his...

4

The 12 Days of Christmas(Penguins of Madagascar Version)

posted by iLikeKowalski

I wrote this a couple months পূর্বে and..... I'm not 100% sure why I'm choosing to post it now... but........ Whatever.
CAPS= sung
Julien: ON THE FIRST দিন OF CHRISTMAS, MY TRUE প্রণয় SHIPPED TO ME
A BOOMY BOX WITH SPARE BATTERIES!
Skipper: ON THE সেকেন্ড দিন OF CHRISTMAS, MY TRUE প্রণয় SHIPPED TO ME
2 ট্যাংকবিধ্বংসী ক্ষেপনাস্ত্র নিক্ষেপের হালকা BLASTERS
AND A BOOMY BOX WITH SPARE BATTERIES
Private: ON THE THIRD দিন OF CHRISTMAS, MY TRUE প্রণয় SHIPPED TO ME
3 BABY DUCKLINGS
2 ট্যাংকবিধ্বংসী ক্ষেপনাস্ত্র নিক্ষেপের হালকা BLASTERS
AND A BOOMY BOX WITH SPARE BATTERIES
Rico: BLA BLA BLA BLAA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLAA BLA BLA BLA
BBBBLA BLA BLA BLA BLA
3 BABY DUCKLINGS
2 ট্যাংকবিধ্বংসী ক্ষেপনাস্ত্র নিক্ষেপের হালকা BLASTERS...

5

The Penguins meet Meep (Part 1/3)

posted by Katie_Kat200

আপনি know that Phineas and Ferb episode where they find that alien that only says "Meep!" (HEY I CAN BE A অনুরাগী OF OTHER SHOWS!) Well, I think our boys should meet Meep now. Don't ask, I just came up with this at the শীর্ষ of my head.

Authors Note: This is like a transcript, so আপনি can act it out with your friends

Scene 1: পেংগুইন Habitat, on শীর্ষ of the floe
Kowalski: Alright, Rico, ready to test my new invention?
Rico: Uh-huh!
Kowalski: Alright! (holds up a complicated looking machine) ready?
Rico: Yeah! (puts on baseball glove)
Kowalski: Playball! (he hold up the machine and shoots a baseball up in the...

2

The Truth, Lies, and Doris - A Dorski অনুরাগী fiction: Part 3 - Fierce Bargain

posted by Bluepenguin

The Truth, Lies, and Doris - A Dorski অনুরাগী fiction: Part 3 - Fierce Bargain

    Kowalski felt as if he were floating in space. Probably because he was tied and hanging upside down from a hook on the ceiling. The blood had all rushed to his head, making his reactions slow and dazed. Waking up from his unconscious dreams, Kowalski made out a blurry figure, in the shape of a dolphin.
    "Well peng-u-in! I see আপনি fell for my carefully planned trap!" Dr. Blowhole said.
    The sun from the a very small window on the roof came down and illuminated...

3

The Truth, Lies, and Doris - A Dorski অনুরাগী fiction: Part 2 - Coney Island

posted by Bluepenguin

The Truth, Lies, and Doris - A Dorski অনুরাগী fiction: Part 2 - Coney Island
    *Sniff, sniff*
    (Sea salt, rollercoaster grease and all-beef franks?)
    Kowalski quickly stood up, still half-asleep, and looked around. He moved a step closer to কূল to get a better view and tripped over something small. He picked it up, "A crushed soda can?"
    Kowalski realized he had washed up onto Coney Island based on the colorful machines and the carousel, and with this he also remembered yesterday's drama. Skipper's betrayal,...

Marlene's Choice Parts 1 and 2

posted by CoolNala

Part 1 - The হারিয়ে গেছে Otter
Setting: A দুর্গ near the ocean on the Western U.S. Coast.
A King ভোঁদড় continues to খুঁজুন for his wife, who suddenly disappeared years পূর্বে one night.
Unbeknownst to him, she would later bore a pup.
So, our story begins with him talking with his squire.
King Otter: "Oh squire, I have searched for years now, but still my wife... She is yet to be found."
Squire: "Don't give up your highness. There's still hope."
Before the King could answer, a messenger appeared.
Messenger: "Your majesty. I just received some wonderful news."
King Otter: "What is it, Leah (messenger's name)?"...

2

I am no longer a POM fan.

posted by ThatDarnHippo

Yup. I have officially হারিয়ে গেছে interest of POM. I can't really explain it - I've outgrown it.

My পছন্দ shows have always been adult FBI action shows. Such as Fringe, Bones, and Criminal Minds. If আপনি like POM and other child friendly shows, then I suggest আপনি don't check these out.

I also প্রণয় comedy. But adult comedy. I've liked it since the 5th grade when I barely understood most of the jokes (I didn't get most of the jokes until the 6th grade). Its always appealed to me and I've outgrown কার্টুন at around the age of 11. I would probably still প্রণয় them if they replaced the আবর্জনা we see on...

(500) Days of Summer - Prologue

posted by ThatDarnHippo

TDH: this is a remake to the movie with the same title. The character's personalities may be somewhat altered to fit the characters from the movie. Please read and review. Rated T for sexuality and some language.

Narrator: This is a story of Boy meets Girl.

The boy, Kowalski, grew up thinking he'd never truly be happy until the দিন he met The One. This belief stands from early exposure to Skipper's hard training and being cooped up in his lab making recipes for disaster.

The girl, Summer, did not share this belief. Since the separation from her family, she only loved two things. The first was her long feathery hair. The সেকেন্ড was how easily she could cut it off, and feel nothing.

Kowalski meets Summer on January 8th. He knows almost immediately, she is who he's been searching for.

This is a story of Boy meets Girl, but আপনি should know upfront, this is not a প্রণয় story.

2

The Feather of the Crystal বাজপাখি (part1)

posted by Icicle1penguin

This is one looong chapter. XD
And it has me in it! :3
Seriously. Long chapter. Find time to read it. XD

______________________________

Chapter 1: For starters

Monday. 10:03 a.m.

It was a warm breezy দিন in the মাস of May (Hey, that rhymed!). The penguins were lying around the HQ, bored. Their training was done for the day, sooner then Skipper expected.

Kowalski was mixing different chemicals at one corner of the room, hoping to discover something out of the blue. Rico was just brushing his doll girlfriend's plastic hair...for 52 মিনিট straight. Private was watching TV, changing the channels...

2

Carol of the বড়দিন Night

posted by Rini_Kowalski

My first fanfiction! Enjoy!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It was বড়দিন eve, 7:56 P.M.
Four penguins of the New York Central Park Zoo were preparing for Christmas.
Setting up the usual Ice tree, hanging mistletoe, (<-- just in case..) and stalkings. Private enjoyed Christmas. a few years পূর্বে when he was still new to the penguins HQ, he seriously was confused.
Skipper told him: "Private, আপনি must understand, this পেংগুইন HQ does not believe in Santa Clause. He's just a fat man who was originally a Hobo and was thrown into the North Pole where he found Reindeers that are...

Diary of Marlene

posted by beastialmoon

Skipper sighed. Another mission, another day. This time, Marlene needed help getting popcorn. He sipped his coffee. If only she knew, knew how much he cared. But it could never be. She didn’t feel the same way. At least, as far as he could tell.
Speak of the devil. Marlene burst in the door.
“Guys! Guys!” she shouted, running around with her arms flailing about.
“Guys, my diary – it’s gone!” Private gasped in horror. “Maybe আপনি misplaced it somewhere.”
“Don’t worry Marlene; we’ll help আপনি find it.” Skipper smiled. He glanced at his boys. Already they were set off into...

2

There is a Reason: Chapter 4

posted by krazy4kowalski

The Final Battle

Ok, so this is pretty much the climax of the story. I realize that the chapters have been getting shorter and shorter, but this is the longest one since the first. Anyway, this chapter gets a little violent so if আপনি don’t like your পছন্দ characters getting hurt, send me a message, and I’ll tell আপনি what happened. দ্বারা the way, I think one of the Narnia বই has the same শিরোনাম as this chapter so if আপনি happen to be the author….. PLEASE DON’T SUE! All right, back to the story.

Skipper surfaced, greedily gulping air. The stink made him retch, but he was too worried...

1

There is a Reason: Chapter Two

posted by krazy4kowalski

A Journey and a Job

Okay, well, here’s the সেকেন্ড chapter! Sorry about that ridiculously long intro on the পূর্ববর্তি chapter. This one is shorter. In fact it should be over right about… NOW!

“Skippa?” Private ব্যক্ত through his beak, “Just how long do we have to stay like this?”
The team was seated in a large pile of beanie শিশুরা at the LaGuardia souvenir stand.
“Just until our plane comes in, young Private,” the leader answered.
“Well, who’s idea was it to প্রদর্শনী up three hours early?” Johnson complained, “I can’t feel my…uh, never mind,” he said, seeing Private staring...

The Danes in Denmark

posted by skipper321

Not alot of people know what happend in Denmark with Skipper. So, heres my idea.

Skipper jumped off the plane silently as it headed over Denmark. He was on a mission for the পেংগুইন strike force. They located Blowhole in Denmark and they sent their best spy to go and spy on him.

Skipper landed and headed to a secret HQ to get আরো information. Unlike the US, they had puffins. There organazation was called The Danes.

Skipper entered the Danes HQ and went to the comando,Hans. Hans told skipper where Blowhole was and he headed for it. Halfway there,he saw a strange man in colorful clothing and long...